New Rules For The Control Of Food Safety – Part 2 of 2
The FDA’s goal is to devise an approach that effectively protects the food supply in a practical, cost-effective manner”. The proposed rule is the sixth issued this year by the FDA under the Food Safety Modernization Act, which is meant to modernize the safety of foods made in the United States and those imported into the country. Under the proposed rule, provisions facilities would be required to have written food defense plans to correct major security weaknesses in their food production processes. Staggered implementation dates for the rule would be based on business size, and wander from one year to three years after the rule in finalized, the FDA said. The proposed rule is open to public comment until March 31, 2014 malehard.men.
Parts: 1 2
New Rules For The Control Of Food Safety – Part 1 of 2
New Rules For The Control Of Food Safety. A untrodden rule to protect the nation’s food supply from terrorism has been introduced by the US Food and Drug Administration, the force announced Friday in Dec 2013. The proposed rule would require the largest food businesses in the United States and in other nations to take steps to keep facilities from attempts to contaminate the food supply. The FDA said it does not know of any cases where the food supply was intentionally tainted with the aim of inflicting widespread harm, and added that such events are unbecoming to occur.
However, the new rule is a preventive measure that would help ensure the safety of the food supply. “The goal is to protect the food supply from those who may attempt to cause large-scale public haleness harm,” Michael Taylor, the FDA’s deputy commissioner for foods and veterinary medicine, said in an agency news release. “Such events, while unlikely to occur, must be taken seriously because they have the likely to cause serious public health and economic consequences.
Parts: 1 2
People With Epilepsy Have Increased Risk Of Mortality – Part 3 of 3
Another dab hand said the risk needs to be put into perspective. “The risk of sudden, unexplained death is real and it’s there, but the numbers are not humongous. There’s not a sudden, unexplained death epidemic,” said Dr Inna Vaisleib, a pediatric neurologist and epileptologist at Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh.
She incisive out that the researchers were able to identify some risk factors associated with an increased risk of death, such as the absence of a five-year remission, a description of prolonged seizures (status epilepticus) and epilepsy with symptomatic causes, such as a head trauma or a neurological problem. Still most parents don’t need to be overly concerned van sale in srilanka. About 70 percent of children outgrow their epilepsy by adolescence and kids who quit having seizures don’t have an increased risk of death.
Parts: 1 2 3
People With Epilepsy Have Increased Risk Of Mortality – Part 2 of 3
The most serious complication that occurs more often in males and females with epilepsy is sudden unexplained death. However, little is known about why this is so. The current study included 245 children living in Finland who were diagnosed with epilepsy in 1964. The children were followed prospectively for 40 years, and in most cases, when a extinction occurred, an autopsy was performed.
The researchers found that 60 (24 percent) of the study volunteers died during the follow-up period. Forty eight percent of those who died had wise seizures in the previous five years. Not all of the deaths were related to epilepsy, but the researchers found that 33 (55 percent) were. Eighteen of the deaths were considered precipitate unexplained deaths.
Nine people had either a definite or probably seizure before dying, and six accidentally drowned, presumably as a result of a seizure while swimming or bathing alone. The overall risk of sudden, unexplained destruction was 7 percent over 40 years. In an analysis that only included people who weren’t in long-term epilepsy remission and who weren’t receiving medication, the overall risk of sudden, unexplained extermination was 12 percent, according to the study.
And “Epilepsy is a serious disorder, which has increasingly recognized comorbidities, including – if it persists into adulthood – an increased risk of death”. Although the researchers don’t recognize why the risk of sudden death is increased in people with epilepsy, Shinnar said it’s a good idea to try to maintain full seizure control and to be compliant with your medications. “People who are doing ratify may start skipping their medications or forgetting them,” he said “We really don’t know if seizure control could make a difference in the risk of sudden, unexplained death”.
Parts: 1 2 3
People With Epilepsy Have Increased Risk Of Mortality – Part 1 of 3
People With Epilepsy Have Increased Risk Of Mortality. People with minority epilepsy who continue to have seizures into adolescence and beyond face a significantly higher risk of death than folk who’ve never had epilepsy, new research suggests. In a study that followed 245 children for 40 years following their epilepsy diagnosis, researchers found that 24 percent died during that time period. That’s a place of death that’s three times as high as would be expected for people without epilepsy who were of a similar age and sex.
And “In those people with childhood-onset epilepsy, those who do not outgrow their seizures have a substantially higher mortality reprimand over many years,” said study senior author Dr Shlomo Shinnar, director of the Comprehensive Epilepsy Management Center at the Children’s Hospital of Montefiore in New York City. But the chance to any individual in any given year is still less than 1 percent.
And the good news from the study is that “once you have seizure remission, mortality rates are similar to people without epilepsy “. The findings are published in the Dec 23, 2010 efflux of the New England Journal of Medicine.
Epilepsy is a disorder of the brain caused by abnormal signaling messages from nerve cell to nerve cell, according to the US National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke. Those freakish signals can cause strange sensations, muscle spasms, seizures and even a loss of consciousness.
Parts: 1 2 3
Researchers Warn About The Harmful Influence Of TV – Part 3 of 3
The stress “could be a normal, shooting and immediate reaction to an event that dissipates”. But the gist of the study stands, she said: More exposure to coverage seems to be connected to more stress. The study authors suggested that doctors, ministry officials and the media be aware of this link. Jon Elhai, an associate professor of psychology and psychiatry at the University of Toledo, said the study appears to be both valid and important, although researchers are divided on whether Internet surveys such as the one occupied in this study are valid.
Elhai acknowledged that it’s difficult to figure out which came first – stress or news coverage. People might be stressed in general and be strained to news coverage or become stressed out by the coverage. But Elhai praised the researchers for trying to account for the mental health of the participants.
Why do the findings matter? “Knowing information about the effect of media experience on mental health after a disaster can inform public health initiatives. For example, after a local disaster, the Red Cross usually tries to get local media coverage to help accord information about physical and mental health problems that may be present in order to help people adjust and get help that they may need” recommended site. The study appears in the Dec 9-13, 2013 issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Parts: 1 2 3
Researchers Warn About The Harmful Influence Of TV – Part 2 of 3
It’s important to understand that variation”. Holman, who studies how people become stressed, has worked on quondam research that linked acute stress after the 9/11 attacks to later heart disease in people who hadn’t shown signs of it before. Her research has also linked watching the 9/11 attacks survive to a higher rate of later physical problems. In the new study, researchers used an Internet survey to ask questions of 846 Boston residents, 941 New York City residents and 2888 masses from the rest of the country.
The respondents regularly take part in surveys in return for compensation; the surveys don’t include people who can’t or won’t use the Internet. Those who were exposed to six or more hours of bombing bulletin coverage a day reported more than twice as many symptoms of “acute stress,” on average, as those who were directly exposed. The symptoms included such things as being “on edge” or maddening to avoid thoughts of the bombing and its aftermath.
Holman said the findings held up even when the researchers adjusted their statistics so they wouldn’t be thrown off by the numbers of people who are stressed out in general. What about the faculty of the most stressed-out people to devote six or more hours to news coverage a day? Does that mean they’re retired, on disability or unemployed, and could that status play a role? Holman said being employed or idle doesn’t appear to be a significant factor in the findings. Holman cautioned that the findings examined stress levels in the weeks after the bombings but didn’t look at them over the long term.
Parts: 1 2 3
Researchers Warn About The Harmful Influence Of TV – Part 1 of 3
Researchers Warn About The Harmful Influence Of TV. A redesigned study suggests that immersing yourself in news of a shocking and tragic event may not be good for your sentimental health. People who watched, read and listened to the most coverage of the Boston Marathon bombings – six or more hours daily – reported the most acute stress levels over the following weeks. Their symptoms were worse than clan who had been directly exposed to the bombings, either by being there or knowing someone who was there.
Those exposed to the media coverage typically reported around 10 more symptoms – such as re-experiencing the tragedy and appreciation stressed out thinking about it – after the results were adjusted to account for other factors. The study authors say the findings should raise more concern about the effects of graphic news coverage. The investigate comes with caveats. It’s not clear if watching so much coverage directly caused the stress, or if those who were most affected share something in common that makes them more vulnerable.
Nor is it known whether the stress affected people’s mortal health. Still, the findings offer insight into the triggers for stress and its potential to linger, said study author E Alison Holman, an associate professor of nursing science at the University of California, Irvine. “If community are more stressed out, that has an impact on every part of our life. But not everyone has those kinds of reactions.
Parts: 1 2 3
The American Oncologists Work More Than 50 Hours Per Week – Part 3 of 3
The number of hours worked by oncologists in academic medical centers and private practice were similar but 81 percent of oncologists in impractical medical centers cared for patients with a specific type of cancer, compared to 17 percent of those in private practice. Data and conclusions of research presented at meetings should be considered preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed medical journal extender.
Parts: 1 2 3